NERO
v.
UNITED STATES

6th Cir. | 1951-06-06
No. 11332
189 F.2d 515 United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (1951) Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of violation of § 2593(a), 26 U.S.C. (unlawfully acquiring marijuana). On appeal from the judgment he contends that the court should have found as a matter of law that he had been illegally entrapped, and should have directed a verdict of not guilty.

This case is not analogous to Morei v, United States, 6 Cir., 127 F. 2d 827, in which it was held that when the accused has never before committed such an offense as that charged against him and has been induced by the Government to commit the offense for the purpose of prosecution, the transaction constitutes an illegal entrapment invalidating the conviction.

Here it is shown by direct evidence of an eyewitness that the appellant had previously engaged in a course of similar criminal conduct. Cf. United States v. Becker, 2 Cir., 62 F. 2d 1007. This fact justifies the effort of the agent to test the appellant. Weathers v. United States, 5 Cir., 126 F. 2d 118; Cratty v. United States, 82 U.S.App.D.C. 236, 163 F. 2d 844. Cf. Sorrells v. United States, 287 U.S. 435, 441, 442, 53 S.Ct. 210, 77 L.Ed. 413.

We think that the case was properly submitted to the jury; that the verdict was supported by sufficient evidence; and that no reversible error exists in the record.

Judgment affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw