MYRAN RUTH MERRITT POSEY, APPELLANT,
v.
JACKY DEWAYNE MERRITT, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1982-10-12
No. AG-416
LARRY G. SMITH and JOANOS, JJ., concur.
420 So. 2d 373 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1982)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court affirmed the change of custody judgment and remanded the motion for attorney's fees to the trial court for a determination of entitlement and amount.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant wife sought reversal of a judgment changing child custody to the appellee husband. The husband also sought taxation of costs and attorney fe…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
SHAW, Judge.

SHAW, Judge.

Appellant wife seeks reversal of a judgment granting a change of custody of a child from the mother to the father. We find no error and affirm.

The appellee husband seeks taxation of costs and allowance of attorney fees against appellant. The motion for costs should be served in the trial court in accordance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.400(a).

Normally, when a motion for appellate attorney fees in a marriage dissolution action is received, there has been a previous determination by the trial court that an economic disparity existed between the parties and that the moving party was entitled to fees in the trial court. Predicated on this trial court determination, unless we deny the petition outright, we provisionally grant the award and remand for a determination of a reasonable fee and the portion of it, if any, that the non-moving party should be required to pay because of a continuing disparity in the parties’ needs and ability to pay. See Dresser v. Dresser, 350 So. 2d 1152 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). Here, however, so far as the record on appeal shows, there has been no determination of an economic disparity between the parties. We follow the Dresser procedure but modify it to provide for such a determination.

We AFFIRM the judgment and REMAND appellee’s motion for allowance of attorney’s fees to the trial court for determination of appellee’s entitlement to fees and the amount, if any, to be paid by appellant.

LARRY G. SMITH and JOANOS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw