FRUEHAUF TRAILER CO.
v.
MYERS

9th Cir. | 1950-03-24
No. 12253
181 F.2d 1008 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1950) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal, pursuant to Title 28 U. S.C.A. § 1292(4), from a judgment again holding United Státes Letters Patent No. 2,090,874 to Myers, appellee here, valid and infringed. See Myers v. Beall Pipe & Tank Corp., D.C.Or. 1940, 36 F.Supp. 752; Page v. Myers, 9 Cir., 1946, 155 F. 2d 57.

Appellant conceded at the bar upon oral argument that all claims of the patent in suit are valid, so only the issue as to infringement remains to be considered. On this issue the evidence clearly sustains the holding of the learned trial Judge. See Myers v. Fruehauf Trailer Co., D.C., 90 F.Supp. 265.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Other
PER CURIAM.

On Petition for Rehearing

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s petition for a rehearing is denied. That portion of the petition which seeks a rehearing in banc is stricken because “without authority in law or in the rules or practice of the court”. See Kronberg v. Hale, 9 Cir., 181 F. 2d 767, order upon petition for rehearing filed February 27, 1950; 28 U.S.C. § 46(c).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw