UNITED STATES EX REL. PICICCI
v.
DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION AT PORT OF NEW YORK; UNITED STATES EX REL. RIZZI V. DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION AT PORT OF NEW YORK
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Construction Of Regulations cases and more on FLexlaw
. That failure to possess a visa does not preclude the exercise of such-discretion, cf. Stone ex rel. Colonna v. Tillinghast, 1 Cir., 32 F. 2d 447.
. Nor within §§ 132.1 or 132,2.
. In his petition for rehearing, -respondent did not dispute the correctness of this construction.
. Moreover, 8 U.S.C.A. § 136 (r) provides that nothing in § 136 shall be construed to apply to one class included in 8 U.S. C.A. § 203, i. e., “accredited, oificials of foreign governments.” This goes to show that 8 U.S.C.A. § 203 does not govern 8 U.S.C.A. § 136 (q).
. Mahler v. Eby, 264 U.S. 32, 46, 44 S.Ct. 283, 68 L.Ed. 549; Tod v. Waldman, 266 U.S. 113, 45 S.Ct. 85, 69 L.Ed. 195; Mastrapasqua v. Shaughnessy, 2 Cir., 1950, 180 F. 2d 999; U. S. ex rel. Di Pa-olo v. Reimer, 2 Cir., 102 F. 2d 40, 42; U. S. ex rel. Mazur v. Commissioner of Immigration, 2 Cir., 101 F. 2d 707, 709.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States ex rel. Vito D'Amico v. Earle Bishopp, 286 F.2d 320 (2d Cir. 1961)
Authorities Cited
- Mahler v. Eby, 264 U.S. 32 (U.S. 1924)
- Tod v. Waldman, 266 U.S. 113 (U.S. 1924)
- Mastrapasqua v. Shaughnessy, 180 F.2d 999 (2d Cir. 1950)
- United States ex rel. DI Paola v. Reimer, 102 F.2d 40 (2d Cir. 1939)
- United States ex rel. Mazur v. Commissioner of Immigration, 101 F.2d 707 (2d Cir. 1939)
- Stone ex rel. Colonna v. Tillinghast, 32 F.2d 447 (1st Cir. 1929)