THE CITY OF JACKSONVILLE AND ROY P. MOODY, TAX COLLECTOR, APPELLANTS,

v.

PORCHER P. L'ENGLE, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Watson v. Jones, 41 Fla. 241 (Fla. 1899)
  …e judgment creditor could therefore have no interest in, or right to, any of the proceeds of such sale. Caldwell v. Houser, 108 Ala. 125, 19 South. Rep. 796; Freeman on Executions, §447; Moseley v. Doe, ex dem. Edwards, 2 Fla. 429; Howe v. Robinson, 20 Fla. 352. It is not pretended that the master undertook to sell the property, free from incumbrances, or that the decree authorized him to do so, or that the purchaser was misled in any way to> believe that he was, when he bade for the propert}'- getting a c…
• Como D. Massey v. Pineapple Orange Co., 87 Fla. 374 (Fla. 1924)
  …ceeding was not recorded in Marion County within twenty years from the date of the original judgment. In Mosely v. Edwards, 2 Fla. 429, it was held that the lien of judgment was not lost by mere delay to sue out execution. And in Howe v. Robinson, 20 Fla. 352, it. was held that the lien of a judgment in this State is regulated by statute and that it is not lost because an execution could not issue upon judgment without a scire facias. It was also held that property levied upon and sold under a' junior ju…
• Robinson v. Howe, 35 Fla. 73 (Fla. 1895)
  …Mabry, C. J.: A statement of the allegations of the original bill filed in this case will be found in the case of Howe vs. Robinson, et ux., 20 Fla. 352. After the case reached the Circuit Court under a mandate from this court, the bill was amended, and new parties were added, necessitated in part by the deaths of Calvin B. Dibble and Calvin L. Robinson. The bill under the last amendment has as comp…