JOHN W. PILAND, APPELLANT,
v.
MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, APPELLEE
JOHN W. PILAND, APPELLANT,
MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, APPELLEE
179 F.2d 678
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1950)
Caution
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
A careful study of the record and briefs in this case convinces us that the judgment of the Court below was correct and should be affirmed. In view of the full, clear and convincing opinion of the trial Judge,1 we see no occasion for the writing of an extended opinion. The judgment of the Court below is
Affirmed.
. D.C., 85 F.Supp. 31.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ferrara v. Sheraton McALPIN Corp., 311 F.2d 294 (2d Cir. 1962)
-
Aloysius Harkins v. Ford Motor Co., 437 F.2d 276 (3d Cir. 1970)
-
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Yszara, 263 F.2d 937 (5th Cir. 1959)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence