FACTORY STORES COMPANY OF CLEVELAND, A CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
WILLIAM R. MCCOMB, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court granted the joint motion to remand the cause to the District Court for further proceedings.
The court was hearing a case when a bill pending in Congress was suggested to potentially alter the appropriate course. This bill was enacted, amendin…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM.
This cause came on to be heard before this court on October 21, 1949, at which time it was suggested that, if a bill pending in Congress should be enacted, the appropriate course here would probably be to direct a remand of the cause to the District Court and that, accordingly, it might be well for the court to withhold decision until Congress should act upon the pending bill.
The pending bill referred to was enacted by Congress on October 26, 1949, being an amendment to the Fair Labor Standards Act, Pub.No.393, 81st Cong., c. 736, 1st sess., 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq.
On November 14, 1949, the appellee, William R. McComb, Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, United States Department of Labor, filed a motion to remand in view of the new factual elements and questions of law of vital importance presented by the 1949 amendments.
On November 22, 1949, the appellee, Factory Stores Company of Cleveland, joined in the motion of the appellant to remand the cause to the United States District Court for further procedure;
And it appearing that the joint motions are well grounded, it is ordered that the cause be remanded to the United States District Court for further proceedings and consideration under the 1949 amendments of the Fair Labor Standards Act. 81 F.Supp. 403.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hodgson v. Crotty Bros. Dallas, Inc., 450 F.2d 1268 (5th Cir. 1971)
-
Mitchell v. Moore, 241 F.2d 249 (6th Cir. 1957)