THOMAS A. PRICE, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI AND THOMAS W. KENWORTHY, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ESTATE OF MARY ELIZABETH ADAMS PRICE, DECEASED, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1982-09-14
No. 81-2587
Before DANIEL S. PEARSON, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
419 So. 2d 389 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1982) Caution
Cited by 6 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

A surviving spouse appeals the denial of interest on his elective share of estate assets and a pro-rata share of income earned by the estate during administration.


Holding

The court found that the surviving spouse was not entitled to interest on his elective share for the period between the date of death and the tender of the share, nor a pro-rata share of income earned by the estate during administration.


Headnotes

[1] A surviving spouse is not entitled to interest on an elective share of estate assets unless the personal representative fails to make payment within a time certain as ord…

[2] An order directing a personal representative to satisfy a spouse's elective share creates a due debt against the estate, entitling the spouse to interest at the lawful ra…

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The surviving spouse elected his elective share, but the personal representative tendered the share without interest or a pro-rata share of income ear…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

A surviving spouse appeals an order denying him interest on his elective share of estate assets where twenty-two months elapsed between the date of his wife’s death and tender by the personal representative of his elective share. He claims, in addition, a pro-rata share of the interest income earned by the estate during the course of administration.

The testatrix died on October 19, 1979, and her will was admitted to probate on January 25,1980. Notice of administration was published on January 31, 1980, and on June 26, 1980, appellant filed Election of “Spouse’s Elective Share”. By petition filed January 29, 1981 the personal representative requested an extension of one year in which to close the estate, asserting as grounds “the complexity of the tax matters concerning the estate and the fact that the assets of the estate and interested parties to the estate are located in several states.... ” The court granted the extension ordering that the estate be closed by June 15, 1982. By order entered May 1, 1981, the court found that appellant’s Election of Spouse’s Share was timely filed in that the Personal Representatives had filed an inventory of estate assets on March 10, 1981; the order directed the Personal Representative to satisfy the spouse’s share. On August 20,1981 the personal representatives tendered to appellant a check representing the value of his elective share without interest or pro-rata share of the income earned by estate assets.

Two sections of the probate code appear to control resolution of the question presented. Section 732.207, Florida Statutes (1979) provides:

The elective share shall consist of an amount equal to 30% of the fair market value on the date of death of all assets . .. computed after deducting from the total value of the assets all valid claims against the estate paid or payable from the estate.

The second statutory provision is Section 732.214 which states:

Proceedings on the election.—

On petition of the personal representative or the surviving spouse and after notice and hearing, the court shall determine the amount of the elective share and order its payment in cash or in kind within a time certain from the assets of the estate subject to the elective share. No distribution shall be required until six months from the date of death, when no federal or state tax return is required to be filed, or until the tax return is timely filed when required. The order may provide for partial distributions. On petition of any interested party after notice, the court may suspend distribution of the elective share or any part of it until final settlement of the federal estate tax liabil ity of the estate. Assets distributed in kind shall be distributed at fair market value on the date of distribution, [emphasis supplied]

Although the statute provides that assets distributed in kind shall be distributed at fair market value on the date of distribution, it makes no provision for the surviving spouse to receive interest on his elective share whether distribution is timely or has been suspended.1

The appellant argues that it would be inequitable for the beneficiaries of the residuary estate to receive the interest earned on the assets comprising his elective share while the estate is being administered. The argument has appeal but is without support in the statute. The statute specifically directs that where an election is filed, the remaining assets of an estate are to be distributed as though the surviving spouse had predeceased the decedent. § 732.211, Fla.Stat. (1979).

Appellant, however, is entitled to interest on his elective share from May 5, 1981, the date of order directing the personal representative to make payment. The order to pay created a due debt against the estate in favor of appellant which like any other debt, entitled appellant to the principal of the debt plus interest at the lawful rate from the due date. See § 55.03, Fla.Stat. (1979); McNitt v. Osborne, 371 So. 2d 696 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Parker v. Brinson Construction Company, 78 So. 2d 873 (Fla.1955).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further consistent proceedings.

. “The elective share is an amount computed without regard to income that may be earned by estate assets and no interest is payable to the surviving spouse by virtue of it. It seems likely, however, that, as with judgments generally, if the personal representative failed to make payment ‘within a time certain’ as prescribed by a judgment entered under § 732.214, interest at the legal rate would be payable. Hanley, Elective Share, Basic Practice Under the Florida Probate Code 264 (2d ed. 1981).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Pfeifer v. Varner, 452 So. 2d 622 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
    …nding distribution under certain circumstances, neither concerns the present issue, with which § 738.05(2)(a) specifically deals, of how much the devisee must be paid when the distribution finally occurs. And Price v. Florida National Bank of Miami, 419 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) involves the quite different issue of interest payable on an elective share, which, unlike a specific bequest, is incapable of precise computation until the order directing payment is entered. Most significantly, its holding that…
  • In re Est. OF Joseph Wellington Palmer, 600 So. 2d 537 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)
    …e date of the original order directing payment of the elective share. A surviving spouse is entitled to interest on his elective share from the date of the order directing the personal representative to make payment. Price v. Florida National Bank, 419 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 3d DCA1982); Hanley, Elective Share, Basic Practice Under the Florida Probate Code 280 (3d ed. 1987). Interest from the date of the order directing payment is proper [*539] because “[t]he order to pay create[s] a due debt against the estate in…
  • Williams v. Harrington, 460 So. 2d 533 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)
    …and to, in effect, call upon trial courts in like situations to embark upon the task — of adjusting the statutory scheme to accommodate perceived equities would, we believe, not be a proper judicial role. See Price v. Florida National Bank of Miami, 419 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) where the Third District Court of Appeal followed the literal and plain meaning of sections 732.-207 and 732.214 and held that a surviving spouse was not entitled to interest accruing to his elective share prior to the date of the…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw