JERRY L. HURST, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, APPELLEE
JERRY L. HURST, APPELLANT,
FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, APPELLEE
418 So. 2d 444
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1982)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant’s motion to dismiss has been treated as a motion to strike appellee’s answer brief for failure to timely serve it. The action of the Florida Parole and Probation Commission is affirmed. See Britt v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 417 So. 2d 1079 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Overfield v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 418 So2d 321 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); and Lopez v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 410 So. 2d 1354 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).
McCORD, MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
MAY v. Fla. Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 424 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)…in several cases. See Overfield v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 418 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Britt v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 417 So. 2d 1079 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Hurst v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 418 So. 2d 444 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); and Lopez v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 410 So. 2d 1354 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). As we stated in Overfield: Without extended discussion of whether amendments to the matrix rule constitute procedural changes not subjec…1 / 2
-
Lobo v. Fla. Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 433 So. 2d 622 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)…ex post facto argument. See Rolle v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 426 So. 2d 1082 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); May v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 424 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Hurst v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 418 So. 2d 444 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Britt v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 417 So. 2d 1079 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Overfield v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 418 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); and Lopez v. Florida Parole and Probation Commissio…
-
Woulard v. Fla. Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 426 So. 2d 66 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)…tions, specifically, Overfield v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 418 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Britt v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 417 So. 2d 1079 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), and Hurst v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 418 So. 2d 444 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). At the very minimum, I think the question before us is one that deserves to be certified to the Florida Supreme Court as passing upon a question of great public importance, as was done by the majority in May.…
Authorities Cited
- Lopez v. Fla. Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 410 So. 2d 1354 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
- Overfield v. Fla. Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 418 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
- Britt v. Fla. Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 417 So. 2d 1079 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)