HARRY R. JONES
v.
PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT
HARRY R. JONES
PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT
166 F.2d 299
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (1948)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Careful examination of the briefs and record and consideration of the oral arguments in the appeal at bar convince us that the court below did not commit reversible error in the admission or introduction of testimony or in its instructions to the jury. We conclude therefore that the judgment of the court below, 75 F.Supp. 855, must be affirmed. An order will be entered accordingly.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Cardeza's Estate, 173 F.2d 19 (3d Cir. 1949)
-
Hight v. United States, 256 F.2d 795 (2d Cir. 1958)
-
Marine Nat'l Bank OF Erie v. Commissioner OF Internal Revenue, 168 F.2d 400 (3d Cir. 1948)