ANDRE BAROSY, APPELLANT,
v.
LANDSCAPE CRANE AND FLORIDA FARM BUREAU INSURANCE COMPANIES, APPELLEES

Fla. 1st DCA | 1982-08-18
No. AJ-262
SHAW and WIGGINTON, JJ„ concur.
418 So. 2d 400 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1982)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the loss of use of temporary partial disability benefits due to bad faith handling of a workers' compensation claim constitutes sufficient economic loss to justify an attorney's fee award.


Facts & Procedural History

A deputy commissioner found a workers' compensation carrier handled a claim in bad faith but denied an attorney's fee because the claimant suffered no…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
SHIVERS, Judge.

SHIVERS, Judge.

Barosy appeals a workers’ compensation order granting the claimant benefits for temporary partial disability benefits but denying an attorney’s fee. Although the deputy commissioner determined the carrier handled Barosy’s claim in bad faith, he found Barosy suffered no economic loss as required by section 440.34(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1979). The deputy, therefore, denied the claim for attorney’s fee. We reverse the order to the extent it denied the claim for attorney’s fee.

The record reveals that the deputy commissioner believed the statute required the bad faith handling of the claim to result in an economic loss such as a house foreclosure or a diminished standard of living. The attorney’s fees statute, however, is to be liberally construed. Florida Erection Services, Inc. v. McDonald, 395 So. 2d 203 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). Thus, where there is any economic loss due to a bad faith handling of a claim, an award of an attorney’s fee is appropriate. The record on appeal demonstrates payment of the claimant’s benefits was delayed for a considerable period. This loss of use of the money (TPD benefits), is a sufficient economic loss to justify an attorney’s fee.

Accordingly, the order is reversed to the extent it denied an award of an attorney’s fee. The deputy commissioner is further cautioned to apply the attorney’s fees provisions found in section 440.34, Florida Statutes (1979). The cause is, therefore, remanded to the deputy commissioner with instructions to reconsider the attorney’s fee issue and to enter an order consistent with this opinion.

SHAW and WIGGINTON, JJ„ concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw