EL DORADO TERMINAL COMPANY, A CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
GENERAL AMERICAN TANK CAR CORPORATION, A CORPORATION, AND GENERAL AMERICAN TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION, A CORPORATION, APPELLEES; SAME V. GENERAL AMERICAN TANK CAR CORPORATION, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court determined that a ne exeat bond, conditioned on the defendant's appearance and not departing without leave, was breached by the defendant's failure to pay alimony and fees as ordered in a final decree.
A ne exeat bond conditioned on the defendant's appearance and not departing without leave is breached by the defendant's failure to comply with a final judgment ordering payment of alimony and fees.
Robert A. Buonanno was ordered to pay alimony and fees to his wife, secured by a ne exeat bond. When Buonanno failed to pay, an action was brought aga…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM.
The judgments of the District Court, are affirmed upon the authority of General American Tank Car Corporation v. El Dorado Terminal Co., 308 U.S. 422, 60 S.Ct 325, 84 L.Ed. 361; El Dorado Oil Works v. United States, 328 U.S. 12, 66 S.Ct 843, 90 L.Ed. 1053; Allowances for Privately Owned Tank Cars, 258 I.C.C. 371.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Gen. Am. Tank Car Corp. v. El Dorado Terminal Co., 308 U.S. 422 (U.S. 1940)
- EL Dorado OIL Works v. United States, 328 U.S. 12 (U.S. 1946)