SUPERIOR MOTOR CARS, INC.,
v.
DIDDEN ET AL.

D.C. Cir. | 1944-07-24
No. 8691
Before GRONER, Chief Justice, and MILLER and EDGERTON, Associate Justices.
144 F.2d 369 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1944)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court dismissing a complaint because of failure to state a claim for which relief could be granted. The case arises out of a lease of certain business property in the City of Washington for the period of a year, with an option to renew on thirty days’ written notice before the expiration of the term. Tenant failed to give any notice of intention to renew and the landlord instituted repossession proceedings in the Municipal Court. The present action was begun in the United States District Court by the tenant against the landlord for specific performance of the contract. The ground for relief is that at the time for exercising the option Glassman, President of appellant, was in the penitentiary and his attorney was sick.

We have examined the record carefully and are of opinion that the lower court was correct in dismissing the proceedings. See Clayman v. Totten, 56 App.D.C. 115, 10 F. 2d 910.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw