F. V. INVESTMENTS, N. V., A NETHERLANDS ANTILLES CORP., AND RIVERPOINT, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANTS,
v.
SICMA CORP., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
The preliminary injunction issued pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(a) is reversed on two grounds. First, the acts enjoined by the injunction are not specified with such reasonable definiteness and certainty that the defendants bound by the decree would know what they must refrain from doing without the matter being left to speculation and conjecture. See Moore v. City Dry Cleaners & Laundry, Inc., 41 So. 2d 865, 871 (Fla.1949). Secondly, the complaint for injunctive relief fails to set forth clearly, definitely, and unequivo cally sufficient allegations to warrant the intervention of a court of equity. Cramp v. Board of Public Instruction of Orange County, 118 So. 2d 541 (Fla.1960); Stanton v. Harris, 152 Fla. 736, 13 So. 2d 17 (Fla.1943).
Reversed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Swensen v. Lofton, 457 So. 2d 1069 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)…ual allegations to support appellees’ conclusion of “irreparable damage” necessary to warrant intervention of a court of equity. Cramp v. Board of Public Instruction of Orange County, 118 So. 2d 541 (Fla.1960); F.V. Investments, N.V. v. Sicma Corp., 415 So. 2d 755 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Quadomain Condominium Association v. Pomerantz, 341 So. 2d 1041 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); First National Bank in St. Petersburg v. Ferris, 156 So. 2d 421 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963). For this reason we conclude that the temporary injunction wa…
-
E-Racer Tech, LLC v. Off. OF the Attorney Gen. Dep't OF Legal Affairs, 198 So. 3d 1107 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016)…temporary injunction order is facially defective because it provides insufficient and inconsistent directions. An injunction is invalid if it does not specify the acts enjoined with reasonable definition and clarity. F.V. Invs. N.V. v. Sicma Corp., 415 So. 2d 755 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(c) provides that an injunction “shall describe in reasonable detail the act or acts restrained without reference to a pleading or another document ...” Here, appellants argue the order requir…
Authorities Cited
- Moore v. City Dry Cleaners Laundry, 41 So. 2d 865 (Fla. 1949)
- Cramp v. Bd. OF Pub. Instruction OF Orange Cnty., 118 So. 2d 541 (Fla. 1960)
- Stanton v. Harris, 152 Fla. 736 (Fla. 1943)