PENNZOIL CO. ET AL.
v.
CROWN CENTRAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION
PENNZOIL CO. ET AL.
CROWN CENTRAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION
140 F.2d 387
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (1944)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal in a trademark infringement suit, in which the District Court held that the plaintiff’s trademark “Pennzoil” was not infringed by the use of the word “Greenzoil” as a trademark for one of its products. We have given careful consideration to the briefs and arguments and are of opinion that the decision of the District Court was correct and that nothing need be added to what was said in its opinion. That opinion is accordingly adopted as the opinion of this court.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States ex rel. Jack & Ethel Gittlemacker v. Cnty. OF Philadelphia, 413 F.2d 84 (3d Cir. 1969)
-
Harold F. Ritchie, Inc. v. Chesebrough-Pond's, Inc., 281 F.2d 755 (2d Cir. 1960)
-
G. D. Searle & Co. v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., 265 F.2d 385 (7th Cir. 1959)
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence