CO-OPERATIVE TRANSIT CO.
v.
DAYOUB
PER CURIAM.
This case came on to be heard on the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel.
And it appearing that the trial court did not err in instructing the jury by pointing out the inconsistency between the answer to interrogatory No. 4 and the general verdict, Rulé 49(b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c; and it appearing that there is substantial evidence to support the verdict of the jury, Cleveland R. Co. v. Hunt, 116 Ohio St. 291, 156 N.E. 133; Cleveland R. Co. v. Merk, 124 Ohio St. 596, 180 N.E. 51; Yager, Receiver, v. Marshall, 129 Ohio St. 584, 196 N.E. 375, it is ordered that the judgment be, and it hereby is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (12 total)
-
Offshore Co. & The Fid. & Cas. Co. of N.Y. v. Johnie M. Robison, 266 F.2d 769 (5th Cir. 1959)
-
McKIE v. Diamond Marine Co., 204 F.2d 132 (5th Cir. 1953)
-
Holland v. Allied Structural Steel Co., Inc., 539 F.2d 476 (5th Cir. 1976)
Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence