NORTH PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
WALTER J. ROTHENSIES, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, FOR FIRST DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, APPELLANT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
This case concerns a petition for rehearing where the court clarifies its original opinion regarding the scope of judicial review of administrative decisions, particularly in relation to the precedent set in Hammond v. Curry.
The court maintains that its original opinion did not depart from Hammond v. Curry, emphasizing that the court's role is to determine if there was a legal and reasonable exercise of administrative judgment based on required procedure and appropriate evidence, rather than re-weighing evidence.
The court is considering a petition for rehearing that argues its original opinion departed from the ruling in Hammond v. Curry. The petition specific…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM.
We think that this case is indistinguishable in principle from McCoach v. Minehill Railway Co., 228 U.S. 295, 33 S.Ct. 419, 57 L.Ed. 842. Upon the authority of that case and for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Kalodner for the District Court in this case, 45 F.Supp. 486, the judgment is affirmed.