NAILLING
v.
UNITED STATES
NAILLING
UNITED STATES
124 F.2d 431
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (1941)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 9 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This case came on to be heard upon the record, briefs, and argument of counsel ; and it appearing that the only question presented relates to the sufficiency of the evidence, and that no motion was made for a directed verdict at the conclusion of all the evidence; and it appearing that this court will not consider the sufficiency of the evidence unless it is satisfied that there has been a miscarriage of justice (Roney v. United States, 6 Cir., 37 F. 2d 341); and it also appearing from the record that the evidence amply supports the verdict and judgment and that no injustice has been done:
It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment be, and it hereby is, affirmed.'
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fredrick v. United States, 163 F.2d 536 (9th Cir. 1947)
-
Cutter v. Cincinnati Union Terminal Co., 361 F.2d 637 (6th Cir. 1966)
-
Novick v. Gouldsberry, 173 F.2d 496 (9th Cir. 1949)
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Roney v. United States, 37 F.2d 341 (6th Cir. 1930)