ESTECH GENERAL CHEMICALS CORP. A/K/A SWIFT AGRICULTURAL CHEMICALS CORP. AND FRED S. JAMES AND CO. OF FLORIDA, INC., APPELLANTS,
v.
ANTHONY RANDOLPH, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Affirmed finding of compensable workers' compensation injury and awards of permanent disability, future care, and costs, but reversed temporary total disability benefits for periods lacking medical evidence of incapacity or documented job search failure.
An employee claiming temporary total disability must either present medical evidence of incapacity to work or demonstrate that a documented job search failed due to the work-related injury.
[1] In the absence of medical evidence establishing incapacity to work, a claimant seeking temporary total disability benefits must demonstrate through documented job search…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“The claimant was therefore required to test his disability in the job market”
Establishing that without medical evidence of incapacity, a claimant must demonstrate job search efforts to qualify for temporary total disability benefits.
Claimant Randolph suffered a work injury on October 5, 1979, and reached maximum medical improvement on July 28, 1980. The employer/carrier appealed a…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Work Search Requirement cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The employer/carrier appeal an order finding that the claimant suffered a compensable injury, finding the date of maximum medical improvement (MMI), and awarding temporary total disability (TTD), permanent disability, future care, fees and costs. We affirm in part and reverse in part. The date of the accident was 5 October 1979, the date of MMI 28 July 1980. The only error was the award of TTD benefits for this entire period. There was no medical evidence that the claimant was incapable of work. The claimant was therefore required to test his disability in the job market, LeHigh Corp. v. Byrd, 397 So. 2d 1202 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). There was no evidence of a job search before 4 April 1980. Therefore the finding that the claimant was TTD during the period 5 December 1979 through 4 April 1980 was error. The claimant must show the work search failed because of his disability, LeHigh, supra. He argues that he could not find employment because of the back brace he was wearing. Since Randolph is a laborer this is plausible except for the undisputed fact that the brace was prescribed on 28 July 1980, the date of MMI. No evidence was provided to link the failure of Randolph’s work search to the injury. The award of TTD from April to July 1980 is unsupported and must be reversed.
The order is AFFIRMED in all other aspects.
MILLS, LARRY G. SMITH and SHAW, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Lehigh Corp. & U. S. Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Byrd, 397 So. 2d 1202 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)