ARMADIO RUIZ, A/K/A ROBERTO PUIG, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Search Incident To Lawful Arrest cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The final judgment of conviction and sentence under review is affirmed. We reject the defendant’s central argument on appeal that the trial court erred in denying the motion to suppress the evidence which formed the basis for the criminal charges in this cause as clearly the search herein was made incident to a valid arrest of the defendant. New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454, 101 S.Ct. 2860, 69 L.Ed.2d 768 (1981); Chapas v. State, 404 So. 2d 1102 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); Patterson v. State, 402 So. 2d 1190, 1192 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). We have carefully examined the other contentions raised by the defendant and find that they present no reversible error. See e.g., Mackiewicz v. State, 114 So. 2d 684, 689 (Fla.1959); Stanley v. State, 357 So. 2d 1031 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 364 So. 2d 891 (Fla.1978); Dowling v. State, 210 So. 2d 280 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); § 924.33, Fla.Stat. (1981).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Young v. Hector, 740 So. 2d 1153 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)…an errant spouse to destroy a marriage and then to claim benefits equal to those which would have been provided had it remained intact. Smith v. Smith, 378 So. 2d 11, 15 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 388 So. 2d 1118 (Fla.1980); Pitts v. Pitts, 412 So. 2d 404, 405 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Martin v. Martin, 366 So. 2d 475, 475 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)(Schwartz, J., specially concurring); see also Baxter v. Baxter, 720 So. 2d 624, 624 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)(Harris, J., concurring and concurring specially). It seems…
-
Lolan Beers v. The Pub. Health Tr. OF Dade Cnty., 468 So. 2d 995 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)…l to those which would have been provided had it remained intact”); Schwarz, 166 So. 2d at 496 (“a husband is not liable for the necessities of the wife where the separation is occasioned by the fault of the wife”). See also Preston; Pitts v. Pitts, 412 So. 2d 404, 405 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Stone v. Stone, 151 So. 2d 301 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963); Bloom. [*1004] Perhaps the majority’s concern is with the term “abandonment” itself and not the concept behind the defense. In my view, the establishment of abandonment…1 / 2
-
Druckman v. Ira Jay Druckman, 414 So. 2d 1147 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Pitts v. Pitts, 412 So. 2d 404 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Quick v. Quick, 400 So. 2d 1297 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Kaylor v. Kaylor, 390 So. 2d 752 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Price v. Price, 389 So. 2d 666 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), review denied, 397 So. 2d 778 (Fla.1981).…
Authorities Cited
- New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454 (U.S. 1981)
- Stanley v. State, 357 So. 2d 1031 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
- Blackburn v. Cochran, 114 So. 2d 684 (Fla. 1959)
- MacKiewicz v. State, 114 So. 2d 684 (Fla. 1959)
- Vince Alan Chapas v. State, 404 So. 2d 1102 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981)
- Dowling v. State, 210 So. 2d 280 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968)
- Patterson v. State, 402 So. 2d 1190 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)