ORANGE NEWS AND MISSION INSURANCE CO., APPELLANTS,
v.
MARY PRICE, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1982-04-05
No. AE-357
ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., C. J., LARRY G. SMITH and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.
412 So. 2d 35 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1982)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court granted rehearing, vacated its prior affirmance, and reversed the deputy's order regarding a statutory violation due to inadequate notice.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant sought rehearing, pointing out the court affirmed an order that included a reversible error conceded by the appellee. This error involved a …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks rehearing and points out that in determining the merits of •this appeal the Court affirmed the deputy’s order below in its entirety which included disposition of an issue raised by appellants and that was conceded by appellee in her brief to be reversible error. Appellants’ Motion is well taken.

In appellee’s previous appearance before this Court, Duval-Bibb Company v. Mary Price, 402 So. 2d 552 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980), we vacated the deputy’s finding that the employer fired appellee in violation of Section 440.205, Florida Statutes (1979) because there was a lack of proper notice as to the violation. Again that issue is raised and again the deputy erred in his same finding.

Rehearing is granted and we vacate our previous Per Curiam Affirmance. We reverse the deputy’s order that the employer violated Section 440.205 as we find, and the parties acknowledge, that there was inadequate notice that the issue was to be considered at the hearing. Otherwise, the deputy’s order is affirmed.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., C. J., LARRY G. SMITH and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw