EDWARD D. JELLOW AND CARMELLA JELLOW, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS,

v.

THE KEYES COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Bakalarz v. Luskin, 560 So. 2d 283 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)
  …or the granting of a rehearing if the evidence goes to the heart of the issue and is not merely cumulative or impeaching. Cf. Ragen v. Paramount Hudson, Inc., 434 So. 2d 907 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), rev. denied, 444 So. 2d 417 (Fla.1984); Perez v. Pearl, 411 So. 2d 972 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Dade Nat’l. Bank of Miami v. Kay, 131 So. 2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 135 So. 2d 746 (Fla.1961). We deem to be inapposite those cases which recognize that there is constructive notice of the contents of duly recorded docu…
• Penzell v. M & M Constr. Grp. Corp., 915 So. 2d 194 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)
  …herefore takes priority over Penzell’s mortgage. Penzell had actual notice of this judgment and/or was put on notice by the recording of the DEP’s judgment. Penzell and Bank of America also argue, based upon this court’s decision in Perez v. Pearl, 411 So. 2d 972 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), that the DEP did not have a valid lien against the property sold at the tax sale. Again, we must disagree as we conclude that Perez is inapplicable to the instant case. In Perez we found that a judgment establishing liability but…

Authorities Cited

• Stoler v. Metro. Life Ins. Co. & Harold Wolf, 287 So. 2d 694 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)
• Reginald C. Kendry et ux. v. Division OF Administration, 341 So. 2d 1012 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977)
• Schmidt v. Bryant, 312 So. 2d 209 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975)