WILLIAM E. LINDH, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A WILLIAM LINDH & ASSOCIATES, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE,
v.
CITY OF VENICE, APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT
CAMPBELL, Judge.
Appellant Lindh requests that this court reverse the trial court’s denial of attorney’s fees under section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1981), for lack of a justiciable issue of either law or fact. We find this issue is without merit. The appellee City of Venice objects to the lower court’s order awarding costs to appellant. Insofar as the City of Venice was required to pay the travel expenses incurred by Lindh in taking depositions and the costs of copies of depositions, the order as to costs is reversed. See Professional Computer Management, Inc. v. Tampa Wholesale Liquor Co., 374 So. 2d 626 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979) (costs do not include travel to obtain depositions); Ryan v. Beucher, 360 So. 2d 15 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978) (costs improper for copies of depositions). But see State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Sampaio, 374 So. 2d 617 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979) (copies of deposition taxable if served useful purpose).
RYDER, A. C. J., and SCHOONOVER, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Vote, 463 So. 2d 459 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)…arty if such depositions “serve a useful purpose, even though not introduced into evidence.” Fatolitis v. Fatolitis, 271 So. 2d 227, 229 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973); Shumacher v. Well-man, 415 So. 2d 120, 122 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). See Lindh v. City of Venice, 411 So. 2d 351 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981). In the present proceeding, it is undisputed that eight depositions were used by counsel for Winn-Dixie upon the trial either de bene esse or for impeachment purposes. [*461] Accordingly, we reverse and remand this matter to the l…
Authorities Cited
- Prof'l Computer Mgmt., Inc. v. Tampa Wholesale Liquor Co., Inc., 374 So. 2d 626 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979)
- Ryan v. Beucher, 360 So. 2d 15 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978)
- Gale Distribs., Inc. v. RCA Corp., 374 So. 2d 617 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979)
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Sampaio, 374 So. 2d 617 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979)