SULLIVAN VACCARO, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
SULLIVAN VACCARO, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
411 So. 2d 299
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1982)
Caution
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Login v. State, 394 So. 2d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); State v. Grant, 392 So. 2d 1362 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Shapiro v. State, 390 So. 2d 344 (Fla.1980).
Dissent
FERGUSON, Judge
(dissenting).
See dissent in Laurenzano v. State, 402 So. 2d 1304 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
The Honorable Robert M. Deehl v. Knox, 414 So. 2d 1089 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)…ion of a statute which is constitutionally infirm for first amendment overbreadth as applied to anyone else. Gooding v. Wilson, 405 U.S. 518, 92 S.Ct. 1103, 31 L.Ed.2d 408 (1972); State v. Elder, 382 So. 2d 687, 689, n.2 (Fla.1980); Miller v. State, 411 So. 2d 299 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) (Pearson, J., dissenting). . E.g., Tyson v. Lanier, 156 So. 2d 833 (Fla.1963); Scarborough v. Newsome, 150 Fla. 220, 7 So. 2d 321 (1942); 30 Fla.Jur. Statutes § 77 (1974). As we point out, infra, the narrowing construction we pla…
-
Lacalle v. State, 479 So. 2d 814 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)…. 5th DCA [*815] 1984), and upon consideration, deny the relief sought. Our decision is based upon a holding that no departure from the essential requirements of law appears in the record. Combs v. State, 436 So. 2d 93 (Fla.1983); Miller v. State, 411 So. 2d 299 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 419 So. 2d 1199 (Fla.1982). To merit relief by certiorari, a litigant must demonstrate departure from a “clearly established principle of law resulting in a miscarriage of justice.” Combs, 436 So. 2d at 96. The record d…
-
State v. Thompson, 536 So. 2d 388 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)…ty the conduct to be avoided. See and compare Watts v. State, 463 So. 2d 205 (Fla.1985) (state loitering statute held constitutional); State v. Kemp, 429 So. 2d 822 (Fla.2d DCA 1983) (county loitering ordinance held constitutional); Miller v. State, 411 So. 2d 299 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) (county ordinance which adequately set forth proscribed conduct deemed constitutional). The substance of section 37-17(11) bears a rational relationship to the goal of preventing public disorder and is a reasonable and valid exerc…
Authorities Cited
- Shapiro v. State, 390 So. 2d 344 (Fla. 1980)
- Login v. State, 394 So. 2d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
- State v. Grant, 392 So. 2d 1362 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)
- Laurenzano v. State, 402 So. 2d 1304 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)