CLAY B. COFER AND EMILIA COFER, APPELLANTS,
v.
ALBERT P. ROSILLO, GUARDIAN AD LITEM, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1982-03-16
No. 81-2294
Before SCHWARTZ, DANIEL S. PEAR- ' SON and JORGENSON, JJ.
410 So. 2d 1008 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1982)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse on a holding that the Cofers, invited to intervene in this cause by H.R.S. (as agreed to by all the parties), may not now be severed from this litigation because of an apparent personality conflict with the Guardian Ad Litem. In Interest of D.B., 385 So. 2d 83 (Fla.1980); In re M., 176 So. 2d 600 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965).

The trial court’s prior order permitting intervention is hereby reinstated. This cause is remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw