UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
HARRY H. CULVER & COMPANY, A CORPORATION, AND MASSACHUSETTS BONDING & INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS; MASSACHUSETTS BONDING & INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE, HARRY H. CULVER & COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
HARRY H. CULVER & COMPANY, A CORPORATION, AND MASSACHUSETTS BONDING & INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS; MASSACHUSETTS BONDING & INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE, HARRY H. CULVER & COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT
97 F.2d 882
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1938)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
The parties and issues in this case are identical with those in Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Company v. United States of America, 9 Cir., 97 F.2d 879, this day decided. Only the years of the deficiencies and the amount of the bond differ. For the reasons stated in the former opinion, the judgment is reversed and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings in conformity with that opinion.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Home Indem. Co. of N.Y. v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. of Detroit, 167 F.2d 919 (9th Cir. 1948)
-
J. G. Link & Co. v. Cont'l Cas. Co., 470 F.2d 1133 (9th Cir. 1972)
-
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Coleman C. Murnion and Virginia Murnion, 439 F.2d 945 (9th Cir. 1971)
Authorities Cited
- Mass. Bonding & Ins. Co. v. United States, 97 F.2d 879 (9th Cir. 1938)