QUINNIE NEWMAN, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Ellis Richardson v. State, 432 So. 2d 750 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)
  …1), a Florida court may direct that a sentence which is imposed may be served concurrently with a sentence from another jurisdiction. The statutory language infers that there must be an existing ' sentence in that jurisdiction. Cf., Newman v. State, 409 So. 2d 514 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982). Additionally, the date of commencement of a sentence cannot be vague or uncertain. Keel v. State, 321 So. 2d 86 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). Although appellant had been placed on parole, the New Jersey authorities chose not to prosecute…
• Snell v. State, 438 So. 2d 1038 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)
  …e will assume the trial court was referring to number 1A above as that was the only sentence for state prison time already imposed at the time of resentencing. [*1040] Therefore, the sentence in number 2A as corrected is proper. See Newman v. State, 409 So. 2d 514 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982). 3A. Three counts of obtaining property by worthless check—Count 1: one year imprisonment in state prison; Counts 2 and 3: five years’ probation to run consecutively one with the other and concurrently, apparently, with number 2…
• Morton v. Attorneys' Title Ins. Fund, Inc., 32 So. 3d 68 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)
  …in title insurance policies serve as the only “feasible method” to protect the insurers from circumstances that affect title but are not reflected by an examination of the public records. Id. at 855; see, e.g., Louisville Title Ins. Co. v. Guerard, 409 So. 2d 514 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982) (finding the insurer had no duty to indemnify the buyer because unrecorded easements were not within the title insurance policy’s coverage); Krause, 390 So. 2d at 806 (acknowledging that title insurance policies do not presume to…

Authorities Cited

• Teffeteller v. State, 396 So. 2d 1171 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)