CITY AND COUNTY OF DALLAS LEVEE IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT EX REL. ROBERT E. SIMOND ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
P. J. ALLEN, APPELLEE; SAME V. ATLAS METAL WORKS ET AL., APPELLEES; SAME V. J. H. BARR, APPELLEE; SAME V. J. P. BURGESS, APPELLEE; SAME V. CARL CASEY, APPELLEE; SAME V. DALLAS POWER & LIGHT CO., ET AL., APPELLEES; SAME V. DALLAS TERMINAL RAILWAY & UNION DEPOT COMPANY ET AL., APPELLEES; SAME V. EAGLE FORD LAND & INDUSTRIAL COMPANY, APPELLEE; SAME V. EDWARDS REALTY COMPANY, APPELLEE; SAME V. E. R. FAIN ET AL., APPELLEES; SAME V. JOHN M. FOUTS ET AL., APPELLEES; SAME V. GULF, COLORADO & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL., APPELLEES; SAME V. MAGNOLIA PETROLEUM COMPANY ET AL., APPELLEES; SAME V. REPUBLIC NATIONAL BANK & TRUST CO., INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF FRED MCJUNKIN, DECEASED, ET AL., APPELLEES; SAME V. MISSOURI-KANSAS-TEXAS RAILROAD COMPANY OF TEXAS ET AL., APPELLEES; SAME V. CHARLES R. MOORE, APPELLEE; SAME V. CHARLES R. MOORE AND J. B. TEMPLETON, APPELLEES; SAME V. DALLAS RAILWAY & TERMINAL COMPANY ET AL., APPELLEES; SAME V. REPUBLIC NATIONAL BANK & TRUST COMPANY, APPELLEE; SAME V. LESTER A. RUSSELL ET AL., APPELLEES; SAME V. SOUTHWESTERN LAND & LOAN COMPANY, APPELLEE; SAME V. J. O. SPRING ET AL., APPELLEES; SAME V. L. A. STEMMONS ET AL., APPELLEES; SAME V. ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL., APPELLEES; SAME V. COLE LAND & INVESTMENT COMPANY, APPELLEE; SAME V. TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, APPELLEE; SAME V. TEXAS & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL., APPELLEES; SAME V. TEXAS RAILWAY EQUIPMENT COMPANY ET AL., APPELLEES; SAME V. TEXAS COMPANY, APPELLEE; SAME V. TRINITY FARMS SECURITIES COMPANY ET AL., APPELLEES; SAME V. AUGUST M. VILBIG, APPELLEE; SAME V. MARTIN WEISS ET AL., APPELLEES; SAME V. WEST COMMERCE REALTY COMPANY, APPELLEE; SAME V. MRS. FRANKIE E. BELL ET AL., APPELLEES; SAME V. C. M. COCKRELL, APPELLEE; SAME V. C. W. ROBERTS, APPELLEE; SAME V. J. W. VILBIG, SR., APPELLEE

5th Cir. | 1937-04-16
Nos. 8345-8377, 8382-8385
89 F.2d 735 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1937)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

It was stipulated by the parties that the above-named cases should abide the judgment in City and County of Dallas Levee Improvement District ex rel. Robert E. Si-mond et al. v. Industrial Properties Corporation (C.C.A.) 89 F.(2d) 731, this day decided. As the Judgment in that cáse has been affirmed, the judgment in each of the above-named cases is also affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw