ZURLA TRUCKING, INC., AND UNDERWRITERS ADJUSTING COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
ZACHERY D. WRIGHT AND LESLIE J. SCHULTZEL, M.D., APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1982-02-09
No. AB-23
McCORD, ERVIN and SHAW, JJ., concur.
409 So. 2d 235 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1982) Caution
Cited by 6 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We note a $12.50 error in the Deputy’s computations of Dr. Schutzel’s expert witness fee. We therefore amend the order to reflect an award of $262.50 for Dr. Sehult-zel’s fee and, as amended, affirm the order. McCORD, ERVIN and SHAW, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • E. Coast Ins. Co. v. Cooper, 415 So. 2d 1323 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
    …ertificates of insurance, which were sent to Florida, constituted delivery of the policy in Florida. Neither Blue Cross of Florida v. Turner, 363 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978) nor Albury v. The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, 409 So. 2d 235 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) contradicts our view because both cases pertain to group insurance specifically excluded from the statutory definition. We reject the decision of Robert McMullan & Son, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 103 Cal.App.3…
  • State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Kolleen M. Davella, 450 So. 2d 1202 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
    …“evidence the insurance contract and itemized the coverage”. If the brochures and booklets referred to in Blue Cross of Florida, Inc. v. Turner, 363 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978) and Albury v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, 409 So. 2d 235 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) are not defined “policies”, the simple notices of premium sent in this case cannot suffice as policies. The appellee replies strongly on Gillen v. United States Automobile Association, 300 So. 2d 3 (Fla., 1974) and Decker v. Gre…
  • Mathason v. Am. Nat'l Life Ins. Co. of Tex., 855 So. 2d 261 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)
    …of the certificate, putting the appellant on notice of a few specific policy provisions and was not the equivalent of delivery of the full policy in Florida. In a similar situation, in Albury v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, 409 So. 2d 235, 236 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), the court held that an insured was not entitled to fees under section 627.428 where a certificate and policy booklet explaining coverage were delivered to the insured in Florida but the master policy was delivered in Missou…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw