MYRA BODEK, APPELLANT,
v.
RALPH BODEK, APPELLEE
MYRA BODEK, APPELLANT,
RALPH BODEK, APPELLEE
409 So. 2d 192
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1982)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We review by this appeal a final judgment of marriage dissolution in which an attack is made on the alimony award, the absence of a reservation of jurisdiction to review the said alimony award, and the denial of a claim to certain insurance proceeds. Despite the able brief and argument of appellant’s counsel, we are not persuaded that any reversible error was committed below as the judgment appealed from, although not the only judgment which could have properly been entered in this cause, was well within the trial court’s permissible discretion to enter based on this record. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So. 2d 13 (Fla.1976).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Carlisle v. The Dist. Bd. of Trs. of Miami-Dade Cmty. Coll., 611 So. 2d 1370 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)…v. Collection Chevrolet, Inc., 570 So. 2d 1376, 1378 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); De Ruyter v. State, 521 So. 2d 135, 137 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Kuehne & Nagel, Inc. v. Esser Int’l, Inc., 467 So. 2d 457 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Blum v. Merrill Stevens Dry Dock Co., 409 So. 2d 192 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Almeida v. Trushin, 368 So. 2d 346 (Fla.1979); Rudisill v. Taxicabs of Tampa, Inc., 147 So. 2d 180 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962); Rokosa v. Hartford Jai-Alai, Inc., 37 Conn.Sup. 620, 430 A. 2d 1318 (1981).…
-
Puritan Ins. Co. v. Butler Aviation-Palm Beach, Inc., 715 F.2d 502 (11th Cir. 1983)…t erred in holding that a bailment existed, and alternatively that the jury instructions were erroneous. Under Florida law a bailment requires complete delivery of possession, custody and control of the chattel. Blum v. Merrill Stevens Dry Dock Co., 409 So. 2d 192 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App. 1982). Butler contends that in light of the circumstances surrounding the storage of the plane, specifically Gullia’s retention of the key, there was not a complete delivery. We disagree. The facts that we have set out — a fenced a…
Authorities Cited
- Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1980)
- Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So. 2d 13 (Fla. 1976)