THOMAS KRASNOLUTSKY, BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM JACOB KRASNOLUTSKY, AND JACOB KRASNOLUTSKY, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANIS,
v.
THE NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE; PETER ZUBE, AN INFANT, BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM HELEN ZUBE, AND HELEN ZUBE, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, V. THE NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
THOMAS KRASNOLUTSKY, BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM JACOB KRASNOLUTSKY, AND JACOB KRASNOLUTSKY, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANIS,
THE NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE; PETER ZUBE, AN INFANT, BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM HELEN ZUBE, AND HELEN ZUBE, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, V. THE NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
87 F.2d 1009
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1937)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Judgments affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hyman v. McLENDON, 102 F.2d 189 (4th Cir. 1939)
-
Hyman v. McLENDON, 140 F.2d 76 (4th Cir. 1944)