STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,

v.

PRESSLEY ERVIN COOPER AND DONALD XAVIER TYNAN, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Markham v. Markham, 485 So. 2d 1299 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986)
  …r husband failed to preserve this point on appeal because he made no objection below to the award, based on the testimony offered. We think Cohen v. Cohen, 400 So. 2d 463 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981) and Atlantic Coast Development Corporation v. Hofco, Inc., 405 So. 2d 797 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981) are distinguishable because in those cases, there was testimony from an expert witness as to the value of the legal services rendered. What was missing there was testimony from the attorney who rendered the legal services. Here b…
• Schultz v. Waldemar K. Schickedanz, 884 So. 2d 422 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)
  …requires the testimony of the attorney performing the services, the opposing party in that case made an objection at trial regarding the failure of the attorney to testify as to the services performed. See also Atl. Coast Dev. Corp. v. Hofco, Inc., 405 So. 2d 797, 797 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). Our holding was made specifically “in view of appellant’s objection” to the lack of testimony. Cohen, 400 So. 2d at 465. Here, Schultz did not object at the fee hearing. The court sought to streamline the proceedings by al…

Authorities Cited

• State v. Collie, 390 So. 2d 441 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)