AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, ETC., APPELLANT,

v.

GARNETT S. ROGERS, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Cruz v. State, 437 So. 2d 692 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
  …Seal exists.’ United States v. Mayer, 556 F. 2d 245, 249 (5th Cir.1977) (quoting from United States v. Onori, 535 F. 2d 938, 945 (5th Cir.1976)) (emphasis in original). See also Lee v. State, 324 So. 2d 694 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976), and Engram v. State, 405 So. 2d 428 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). Indeed, the defense’s right to question a witness as to what representations were made to him is not dependent on whether they were approved by the court; the inquiries are germane to developing the witness’s interest or bias in…
• Watts v. State, 450 So. 2d 265 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)
  …ch circumstances constitutes constitutional error requiring reversal unless the error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. Davis; Steinhorst; Garey; Hannah; Kelly; Moreno; Russo v. State, 418 So. 2d 483 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); Mendez; Engram v. State, 405 So. 2d 428 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), petition for rev. denied, 417 So. 2d 328 (Fla.1982); Daniels. In the case before us, the trial court erred in restricting the appellant’s cross-examination of both Ruebin and Beasley. However, a review of the record leads us to…
• Henry v. State, 123 So. 3d 1167 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)
  …a. 4th DCA 1983)). “Defendants have the right to introduce evidence of the conditions of a plea bargain entered into between the State and one of its witnesses so that the jury may properly pass upon the credibility of the witness.” Engram v. State, 405 So. 2d 428, 429 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981) (citing Lee v. State, 324 So. 2d 694 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)); Oliver v. State, 442 So. 2d 317, 319-20 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). Such examination is not limited to the fact that charges were pending against the witness; inquiry may be…