RICHARD REID ROGERS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
GEORGE W. HILL, C. F. NEILEY, V. RIGGIO, AND AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES, AND A. C. MOWER AND CHARLES A. PENN (DECEASED), DEFENDANTS; RICHARD REID ROGERS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V. THOMAS R. TAYLOR AND AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
RICHARD REID ROGERS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
GEORGE W. HILL, C. F. NEILEY, V. RIGGIO, AND AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES, AND A. C. MOWER AND CHARLES A. PENN (DECEASED), DEFENDANTS; RICHARD REID ROGERS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V. THOMAS R. TAYLOR AND AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
62 F.2d 1079
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1933)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
Decree affirmed on the authority of Rogers v. Hill, 60 F.(2d) 109 (C. C. A. 2).
(concurring).
I concur on the authority specified in the per curiam. With the matter open, I should reach a different decision.
Concurrence
AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge
(concurring).
I concur on the authority specified in the per curiam. With the matter open, I should reach a different decision.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rogers v. Hill, 289 U.S. 582 (U.S. 1933)
Authorities Cited
- Rogers v. Hill, 60 F.2d 109 (2d Cir. 1932)
- Rogers v. Hill (S.D.N.Y. 1931)