KAUFMANN AND BAER COMPANY, APPELPELLANT,
v.
D. B. HEINER, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE TWENTY-THIRD DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, APPELLEE; SAME V. C. G. LEWELLYN, FORMERLY COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE TWENTY-THIRD DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, APPELLEE

3d Cir. | 1931-12-02
Nos. 4417, 4418
58 F.2d 1082 United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (1931)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

These eases rest on their own peculiar and unusual facts. These have been fully discussed, as well as the law on the subject, in the comprehensive opinion of the court below, 34 F.(2d) 698. Finding ourselves in accord therewith, its judgment is affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw