MCGANN MFG. CO., INC., AND ROBERT G. MCGANN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS,
v.
RUGGLES-COLES ENGINEERING CO., PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE

3d Cir. | 1930-07-09
No. 4278
41 F.2d 1005 United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (1930)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

In the Court below, the Ruggles-Coles Engineering Company, hereafter called plain*1006tiff, charged the MeGann Manufacturing Company, Inc., Robert G. MeGann and William J. Kuntz, inter alia, with infringement of Patent No. 1,229,978, granted June 12, 1917, for a drier. On final hearing, the court below, in an opinion [34 F.(2d) 519] in substance found that the charge that Kuntz, the patentee, bad assigned the patent to the plaintiff under duress, was not true, that the patent was infringed and that MeGann and Kuntz were’personally liable as defendants. The opinion thoroughly discusses every phase of the ease, and this court is in accord with its reasonings and conclusion. There is nothing we can now say that has not already been said in Judge Johnson’s self-sustaining opinion. We therefore adopt it as expressive of our views, and affirm the decree below.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw