SACRAMENTO SUBURBAN FRUIT LANDS COMPANY, A CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
N. H. NEPSTAD, APPELLEE
SACRAMENTO SUBURBAN FRUIT LANDS COMPANY, A CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
N. H. NEPSTAD, APPELLEE
36 F.2d 947
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1929)
Opinion of the Court
This is a companion ease to Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. Melin (No. 5671) 36 F.(2d) 907, to which reference is hereby made for a more particular statement of the facts.
The court instructed the jury as to what constituted a commercial orchard substantially as in the ease of Sacramento, etc., v. Nelson (No. 5683) 36 F.(2d) 929, and in the case of Sacramento, etc., v. Haenggi (No. 5678) 36 F.(2d) 923, and therein held erroneous.
Judgment reversed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Simpson v. City OF Juneau, 36 F.2d 907 (9th Cir. 1929)
- Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. Nelson, 36 F.2d 929 (9th Cir. 1929)
- Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. Curtis, 36 F.2d 923 (9th Cir. 1929)