LACY STEWART
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a first-degree murder conviction and death sentence for Lacy Stewart, finding the evidence legally sufficient after a second trial. The court noted that the State had cured defects from the previous appeal and that the defendant's confession was corroborated.
Yes, the evidence is legally sufficient to support the verdict and judgment of murder in the first degree.
“It is the contention of counsel for appellant that the evidence adduced is legally insufficient to support a verdict and judgment of murder in the first degree.”
This quote states the main legal argument raised by the appellant's counsel.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceLacy Stewart, a minor, was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to death for the killing of Erich Spiller. The conviction was based on a jur…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Corroboration Of Confession cases and more on FLexlaw
The appellant, Lacy Stewart, was by a jury of St. Lucie County, Florida, found guilty of murder in the first degree and by the trial court sentenced to death for the murder of Erich Spiller in said County on October 29, 1946. The appellant is a colored boy and about 17 or 18 years of age when the crime was alleged to have been committed. The appellant did not testify in the case, neither was any evidence adduced in his behalf. It is the contention of counsel for appellant that the evidence adduced is legally insufficient to support a verdict and judgment of murder in the first degree.
The case comes here for the second time. See Stewart v. State, 158 Fla. 753, 30 So. (2nd) 489, in which we remanded the cause for a new trial. The State in the second trial adduced testimony and cured many of the defects pointed out in our original opinion. The signed confession of the defendant offered below was corroborated by other evidence adduced on the second trial and 24 jurors now have heard the witnesses, observed their demeanor on the witness stand, and were satisfied, as shown by two verdicts, that the defendant below was guilty as charged. We have reviewed the evidence to determine if the interests of justice require a new trial and fail to find error in the record; accordingly the judgment appealed from is hereby affirmed.
Affirmed.
THOMAS, C. J., TERRELL, ADAMS, SEBRING, BARNS and HOBSON, JJ., concur.