GEORGE MARTIN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
UNITED STATES, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
GEORGE MARTIN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
UNITED STATES, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
33 F.2d 1022
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (1929)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
The order of the District Court, overruling the motion of the plaintiff in error for a consideration of his special plea of limitations to .the indictment, and for a vacation of the judgment in this cause, is affirmed, on the authority of Martin v. Biddle (C. C. A.) 16 F.(2d) 118, and U. S. v. Mayer, 235 U. S. 55, 35 S. Ct. 16, 59 L. Ed. 129.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Brunett (W.D. Mo. 1931)
Authorities Cited
- United States v. Mayer, 235 U.S. 55 (U.S. 1914)
- Martin v. Biddle, 16 F.2d 118 (8th Cir. 1926)
- Braun v. United States, 16 F.2d 118 (9th Cir. 1926)