OLDEN RICHARD BROWN, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the appellant's contentions did not demonstrate reversible error.
Appellant pleaded guilty to sexual battery and attempted sexual battery, was placed on probation with a condition to complete a sex offender program. …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Probation Revocation cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
These consolidated appeals have been brought by appellant who was charged by indictment with sexual battery and attempted sexual battery. He pleaded guilty to both counts and was placed on probation for a term of seven years on each charge to run concurrently. A condition of the probation was that he enter and satisfactorily complete the mentally disordered sex offender program.
After appellant had spent approximately one year in the program the agency reported, to the trial court that it had exhausted treatment under the program and that appellant had violated the terms of his probation. Upon due and proper hearings the court revoked his probation and sentenced him to thirty years in the state penitentiary under each of the two counts. Appellant seeks to vacate the order of probation and the sentence imposed following the revocation of probation based on the ground that they were unlawfully entered.
We have carefully reviewed the record and briefs in the light of appellant’s contentions and have concluded that reversible error has not been made to appear. Williamson v. State, 379 So. 2d 370 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979), cert. denied, 388 So. 2d 1120 (Fla.1980); King v. State, 373 So. 2d 78 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 383 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Smith v. State, 345 So. 2d 1080 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 353 So. 2d 678 (Fla.1977); Brown v. State, 305 So. 2d 309 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Itapura Cardoso v. State, 421 So. 2d 589 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)…t’s probation. The record in the instant case supports such a finding of willful failure on the part of the defendant to complete such a program which was a special condition of probation. Hines v. State, 358 So. 2d 183 (Fla.1978); Brown v. State, 400 So. 2d 812 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Ordonez v. State, 408 So. 2d 760 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Postell v. State, 383 So. 2d 1159 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Owens v. State, 354 So. 2d 118 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). The appellant relied heavily on Donneil v. State 377 So. 2d 805 (Fla…
Authorities Cited
- Shearund Duron King v. State, 373 So. 2d 78 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
- Brown v. State, 305 So. 2d 309 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974)
- Gulf Mach. Co. & Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Avant, 345 So. 2d 1080 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977)
- Smith v. State, 345 So. 2d 1080 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
- Williamson v. State, 379 So. 2d 370 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)