MONARCH MANUFACTURING COMPANY AND GARDNER FIBRE COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS,
v.
LEVI H. GREENWOOD, OTTO W. SIEBERT, AND WILIIAM E. HOLMAN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES
MONARCH MANUFACTURING COMPANY AND GARDNER FIBRE COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS,
LEVI H. GREENWOOD, OTTO W. SIEBERT, AND WILIIAM E. HOLMAN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES
30 F.2d 548
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (1929)
Caution
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
TMs ease involves no legal questions or principles; the decisive issue being whether tbe patent involved invention. Tbe patent was thoroughly discussed by Judge Bodine, and bis reasons for bolding it valid and infringed are summarized in his opinion. Finding ourselves in accord with the conclusion he reached, a further discussion by this court would simply be an effort to put in different language what be has already so well said. We therefore limit ourselves to affirming the decree on Ms opinion.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Silver-Brown Co. v. Sheridan, 71 F.2d 935 (1st Cir. 1934)
-
Weintraub v. M. B. and G. D. Daniels, 30 F.2d 550 (3d Cir. 1929)