AMIDI ZUBERI, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AMIDI ZUBERI, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
399 So. 2d 1105
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1981)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that petitioner is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Paul v. Jenne, 728 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)…tion would be a violation of a reasonable condition of bail. The court stated: The constitution, however, grants reasonable, not unbridled, release. Should a defendant violate a reasonable condition to bail, bail can be revoked. Middleton[ v. Polk, 399 So. 2d 1105 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)]. Having been provided reasonable bail only to violate a condition thereof, a defendant cannot claim he has been deprived of his constitutional right to bail should the trial court reasonably deny subsequent applications for bail…
-
Gardner v. Ernest P. "Kayo" Murphy, 402 So. 2d 525 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)…e, 386 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980), the trial court concluded that Gardner’s past conduct was sufficient to forfeit his constitutional right to release on bail. We agree with the trial judge that Hancock and the later cases of Middleton v. Polk, 399 So. 2d 1105 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981), and Johnson v. Pellicer, 388 So. 2d 571 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980), indicate there are situations where Florida’s constitutional right to be released on bail can be forfeited upon conduct that “evinces a flagrant disregard of the court…