ODOL CORPORATION
v.
DE OTO
ODOL CORPORATION
DE OTO
23 F.2d 776
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1927)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
The Odol Corporation filed an opposition against the registration of “O. D. O.” as a trademark for liniment to be applied externally. The mark of the opposer is “Odol,” used as a trade-mark on a preparation for “the teeth, mouth, and breath.”’
We agree with the Commissioner of Patents that the goods on which the marks are used are. not of the same descriptive properties, and that the marks are not so similar as to lead to confusion in trade.
The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Matter of the Application of Anna Rosalie Nelson Byers, 230 F.2d 451 (C.C.P.A. 1956)
-
Application of Lane, 146 F.2d 306 (C.C.P.A. 1944)