GUSTAV J. NICHOLS AND MATHILDA NICHOLS, HIS WIFE,
v.
KELLEY HOLDING COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, ET AL.
GUSTAV J. NICHOLS AND MATHILDA NICHOLS, HIS WIFE,
KELLEY HOLDING COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, ET AL.
160 Fla. 405
Florida Supreme Court (1948)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 35 So. 2d 299
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
The contentions of counsel for a reversal of the final decree entered in the Court below have been carefully considered and we have reached the conclusion that these contentions are without merit and the record is free from error. See Shuptrine v. Wohl Holding Corp., 147 Fla. 185, 3 So. (2nd) 524.
Affirmed.
THOMAS, C. J., TERRELL, CHAPMAN and SEBRING, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bowser v. Harder, 98 So. 2d 752 (Fla. 2d DCA 1957)…eculation and conjecture for that of the Jury who heard and considered the evidence.” A jury’s verdict carries with it a presumption of regularity just as a court’s order is presumed to be correct. See Florida Power and Light Co. v. Hargrove, 1948, 160 Fla. 405, 35 So. 2d 1; Putnam Lumber Co. v. Berry, 1941, 146 Fla. 595, 2 So. 2d 133. In the case of Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Price, Fla.1950, 46 So. 2d 481, referred [*754] to in the trial court’s opinion and also referred to in the briefs of each of t…
-
Fla. Power & Light Co. v. Brinson, 67 So. 2d 407 (Fla. 1953)…, 154 Fla. 628, 18 So. 2d 678. We held that whether a pole on which a linesman was injured was improperly rigged, was a question for the jury, and that if such was the case it constituted actionable negligence. Florida Light & Power Co. v. Hargrove, 160 Fla. 405, 35 So. 2d 1. Again, as long ago as 1911, in the case of Escambia County Electric Light & Power Co. v. Sutherland, 61 Fla. 167, 55 So. 83, 91, we declared, under circumstances similar to those here existing, that the defendant was “under obligation…
Authorities Cited
- Shuptrine v. Wohl Holding Corp., 147 Fla. 185 (Fla. 1941)