COLLATERAL INV. CO.
v.
UNITED STATES
COLLATERAL INV. CO.
UNITED STATES
17 F.2d 374
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1927)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
No claim is made in this case that the driver of the truck was prosecuú ed with effect, or at all, under the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. § 10138% et seq.) for the transportation of intoxicating liquor in violation of law, and the automobile was therefore subject to forfeiture under section 3450 of the Revised Statutes (Comp. St. § 6352). United States v. One Ford Coupé Automobile, 47 S. Ct. 154, 71 L. Ed. -; Port Gardner Investment Co. v. United States (decided by the Supreme Court November 23, 1926) 47 S. Ct. 165, 71 L. Ed.
Judgment affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hooven & Allison Co. v. Evatt, 324 U.S. 652 (U.S. 1945)
-
Gulf Fisheries Co. v. MacINERNEY, 276 U.S. 124 (U.S. 1928)
-
The Jugoslavia (E.D. La. 1927)
Authorities Cited
- United States v. One Ford Coupe Automobile, 272 U.S. 321 (U.S. 1926)
- Port Gardner Inv. Co. v. United States, 272 U.S. 564 (U.S. 1926)