GIACOLONE
v.
UNITED STATES
The only question presented by the present writ of error, and not disposed of in Giacolone v. United States, *11113 F.(2d) 108, just decided, is the validity of a search without a warrant.
Without going into details, it appears from the testimony that, when the federal agents approached the building which was used by the plaintiff in error as a distillery, he met them at the door and invited them in. Under these facts, we think the court court below was justified in finding that the plaintiff in error consented to the search, whether the officers were technically trespassers or not, and, having consented, is in no position to now claim that his constitutional rights were invaded. Waxman v. United States 12 F.(2d) 775, decided May 17, 1926.
The judgment is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Page, 302 F.2d 81 (9th Cir. 1962)
-
United States v. Bianco, 96 F.2d 97 (2d Cir. 1938)
-
Poetter v. United States, 31 F.2d 438 (9th Cir. 1929)
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Giacolone v. United States, 13 F.2d 108 (9th Cir. 1926)
- Waxman v. United States, 12 F.2d 775 (9th Cir. 1926)