MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH; CHUBB/PACIFIC INDEMNITY GROUP, APPELLANTS,
v.
ETHEL ANDREWS, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the deputy commissioner's award of 15% permanent partial disability was not supported by competent evidence.
A claimant injured her hand and shoulder and was awarded 15% permanent partial disability. The deputy commissioner relied on Dr. Jones's testimony, wh…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Competent Evidence cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The claimant injured her right hand and right shoulder in April of 1977 while operating a hand stapler. The deputy commissioner found that she suffered an injury to the body as a whole and awarded compensation for a 15% permanent partial disability. The record will support a body as a whole award, but it will not support a 15% anatomical disability.
The deputy commissioner expressly accepted and based his rating upon the testimony of Dr. Harry Jones. The doctor’s testimony is incompatible with a 15% permanent partial disability rating of the body as a whole. It was his opinion that the claimant sustained a 15% permanent disability to the upper extremity, but when he was asked to transpose this rating to the body as a whole, he opined that such a rating would be between two and three per cent.
There being no other competent evidence in the record to support a 15% permanent partial disability to the body as a whole, the order is reversed and the cause is remanded to the deputy with directions that he enter an order consistent with the testimony of Dr. Jones.
SHIVERS, SHAW and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.