PLOUGH CHEMICAL COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
EVA NIEMAN, APPELLEE

D.C. Cir. | 1925-04-06
No. Patent Appeal No. 1732
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.
4 F.2d 1013 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1925) Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases

Opinion of the Court
ROBB, Associate Justice.

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from concurrent decisions of the Patent Office tribunals in a trade-mark interference proceeding involving the mark “Black and White,” for use on almanacs and birthday and dream books. Appellant adopted this mark in 1919. The Patent Office has found, and in that finding we concur, that long prior to that date appellee’s predecessor adopted and used the same mark, and that in 1912 appellee succeeded to the business and good will of her predecessor. The question , is one purely of fact, and, as already intimated, a review of the evidence has convinced us of the correctness of the conclusion reached. The decision therefore is affirmed. Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw