IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF WILLIS H. CARRIER

D.C. Cir. | 1925-04-06

No. Patent appeal No. 1706

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORS-DED, Associate Justices.

4 F.2d 1013 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1925) Positive Treatment

Cited by 5 cases

Opinion of the Court

PER OURIAM.

Appeal from a decision of the Patent Office refusing to allow claims 1 to 8, inclusive, 15, 16, 17, 19; and 20, of appellant’s application for a patent relating to a humidity regulator. After a careful examination of the record and briefs, and giving due consideration to the argument at bar, we are convinced, as were the tribunals of the Patent Office, that the allowance by the office of seven claims of the application protected all the novel features of appellant’s device. For the reasons stated by the Patent Office, we affirm the decision.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

In re Vertex Hosiery Mills, Inc., 45 F.2d 249 (C.C.P.A. 1930)
In re Muskat, 187 F.2d 626 (C.C.P.A. 1951)
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Robertson (D. Md. 1927)

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw