BLANCA CAMPOS, APPELLANT,

v.

DADE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD AND GALLAGHER BASSETT INSURANCE SERVICE, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By (33 total)

• Herrera v. State, 532 So. 2d 54 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)
  …ting Ramirez v. State, 371 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 383 So. 2d 1201 (Fla.1980)). Although mere presence is insufficient to establish participation in a conspiracy, Honchell v. State, 257 So. 2d 889 (Fla.1971); Ashenoff v. State, 391 So. 2d 289 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), and a conspiracy may not be inferred from mere aiding and abetting, Velunza, 504 So. 2d at 782, presence is a factor the jury may consider in determining guilt. See United States v. Castro, 723 F. 2d 1527 (11th Cir.1984); United…
• LaPOLLA v. State, 504 So. 2d 1353 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)
  …nt. King v. State, 104 So. 2d 730 (Fla.1958). One who aids and abets a crime is not a member of a conspiracy if the elements of a conspiracy involving him are not shown, albeit he may be liable for the substantive crime performed. Ashenoff v. State, 391 So. 2d 289 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). There is no conspiracy if there are only aiders and abettors to someone planning or carrying out a crime. Appellants urge that at most they may have been aiders and abettors of a crime other than conspiracy. Appellants do not de…
• Mariano E. Velunza v. State, 504 So. 2d 780 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
  …mirez v. State, 371 So. 2d 1063, 1065 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 383 So. 2d 1201 (Fla.1980). “Although proof of a conspiracy may be inferred from appropriate circumstances, and proof of a formal agreement is not necessary,” Ashenoff v. State, 391 So. 2d 289 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (citations omitted), a conspiracy may not be inferred from the offense which is the object of the conspiracy. See Saylor v. State, 491 So. 2d 340 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). Because the record does not establish an agreement and an intent…